The traders accuse the defendants and other market players of hatching an anticompetitive scheme to restrict Retail Investors’ access to the stock market and prevent the market from operating freely and fairly.Īccording to the traders, the defendants did so to protect each other, and to stop the hemorrhaging losses incurred by the Market Maker Defendants as a result of their accumulation of large short positions. Let’s recall that, according to the plaintiffs, this case is about individual investors who invested their money in the stock market and were stripped of their rights to control their own investments. The defendants in the antitrust tranche of a multi-district litigation concerning the January short squeeze have responded to the amended complaint filed by the plaintiffs in this case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |